How An AI-written Book Shows Why The Tech Horrifies Creatives

For Christmas I received an interesting gift from a friend - my extremely own "best-selling" book.


"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (terrific title) bears my name and my photo on its cover, and it has radiant reviews.


Yet it was completely written by AI, with a few basic triggers about me supplied by my good friend Janet.


It's an interesting read, and very amusing in parts. But it likewise meanders rather a lot, and is someplace in between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.


It mimics my chatty design of composing, however it's likewise a bit repeated, and very verbose. It may have surpassed Janet's triggers in collecting data about me.


Several sentences begin "as a leading innovation reporter ..." - cringe - which could have been scraped from an online bio.


There's also a mysterious, repetitive hallucination in the kind of my feline (I have no animals). And there's a metaphor disgaeawiki.info on nearly every page - some more random than others.


There are dozens of business online offering AI-book composing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.


When I called the primary executive Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he informed me he had offered around 150,000 customised books, primarily in the US, shiapedia.1god.org because pivoting from putting together AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.


A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller costs ₤ 26. The company uses its own AI tools to generate them, based on an open source big language model.


I'm not asking you to buy my book. Actually you can't - just Janet, who produced it, can order any additional copies.


There is currently no barrier to anybody producing one in anybody's name, including stars - although Mr Mashiach says there are guardrails around abusive material. Each book consists of a printed disclaimer specifying that it is imaginary, produced by AI, and created "solely to bring humour and delight".


Legally, the copyright belongs to the firm, however Mr Mashiach stresses that the product is planned as a "customised gag gift", and the books do not get sold even more.


He intends to expand his range, producing various categories such as sci-fi, and perhaps providing an autobiography service. It's created to be a light-hearted type of customer AI - offering AI-generated goods to human consumers.


It's also a bit scary if, like me, you compose for a living. Not least since it most likely took less than a minute to create, and it does, certainly in some parts, sound similar to me.


Musicians, authors, artists and stars worldwide have revealed alarm about their work being utilized to train generative AI tools that then churn out comparable content based upon it.


"We ought to be clear, when we are discussing data here, we really suggest human creators' life works," says Ed Newton Rex, creator of Fairly Trained, which campaigns for AI companies to respect creators' rights.


"This is books, this is short articles, this is photos. It's masterpieces. It's records ... The entire point of AI training is to discover how to do something and then do more like that."


In 2023 a tune including AI-generated voices of Canadian singers Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social networks before being pulled from streaming platforms due to the fact that it was not their work and they had actually not granted it. It didn't stop the track's developer attempting to nominate it for a Grammy award. And even though the artists were phony, it was still hugely popular.


"I do not believe using generative AI for imaginative functions ought to be prohibited, however I do think that generative AI for these functions that is trained on individuals's work without approval ought to be banned," Mr Newton Rex adds. "AI can be really effective however let's develop it fairly and relatively."


OpenAI states Chinese competitors using its work for their AI apps


DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking


China's DeepSeek AI shakes industry and damages America's swagger


In the UK some organisations - consisting of the BBC - have picked to block AI designers from trawling their online material for training purposes. Others have actually chosen to collaborate - the Financial Times has partnered with ChatGPT developer OpenAI for example.


The UK federal government is considering an overhaul of the law that would enable AI developers to use developers' content on the internet to help develop their designs, unless the rights holders opt out.


Ed Newton Rex describes this as "insanity".


He points out that AI can make advances in areas like defence, healthcare and logistics without trawling the work of authors, and artists.


"All of these things work without going and changing copyright law and destroying the livelihoods of the country's creatives," he argues.


Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in your home of Lords, is also strongly against eliminating copyright law for AI.


"Creative markets are wealth creators, 2.4 million tasks and a great deal of joy," says the Baroness, who is also an advisor to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.


"The federal government is weakening one of its finest performing markets on the vague promise of growth."


A federal government representative said: "No move will be made until we are definitely confident we have a useful plan that delivers each of our goals: increased control for ideal holders to help them accredit their material, access to high-quality material to train leading AI designs in the UK, and more openness for best holders from AI developers."


Under the UK government's new AI strategy, a national data library containing public information from a broad range of sources will also be made readily available to AI scientists.


In the US the future of federal rules to control AI is now up in the air following President Trump's return to the presidency.


In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that intended to enhance the safety of AI with, to name a few things, companies in the sector needed to share details of the functions of their systems with the US government before they are launched.


But this has now been repealed by Trump. It remains to be seen what Trump will do rather, however he is said to want the AI sector to deal with less regulation.


This comes as a variety of lawsuits versus AI firms, and especially versus OpenAI, forum.pinoo.com.tr continue in the US. They have been taken out by everybody from the New york city Times to authors, music labels, and even a comic.


They claim that the AI firms broke the law when they took their material from the web without their approval, and utilized it to train their systems.


The AI companies argue that their actions fall under "reasonable usage" and are for wiki.piratenpartei.de that reason exempt. There are a number of elements which can make up fair usage - it's not a straight-forward definition. But the AI sector is under increasing analysis over how it collects training data and whether it ought to be spending for it.


If this wasn't all enough to ponder, Chinese AI company DeepSeek has shaken the sector over the past week. It became the most downloaded totally free app on Apple's US App Store.


DeepSeek declares that it developed its technology for a fraction of the cost of the likes of OpenAI. Its success has raised security issues in the US, and threatens American's present supremacy of the sector.


When it comes to me and a profession as an author, I think that at the minute, if I really desire a "bestseller" I'll still need to write it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the current weakness in generative AI tools for larger projects. It is full of inaccuracies and hallucinations, and it can be quite hard to read in parts because it's so long-winded.


But offered how rapidly the tech is progressing, I'm not sure for how long I can stay confident that my significantly slower human writing and editing abilities, are better.


Register for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the greatest developments in global innovation, with analysis from BBC correspondents around the globe.


Outside the UK? Register here.